Methods of authorization are essential for protecting sensitive information in businesses. Unauthorized access to sensitive data can
Question:
Methods of authorization are essential for protecting sensitive information in businesses. Unauthorized access to sensitive data can cause the company to suffer major financial losses, harm its reputation, and lose the faith of its clients. Unintentional torts might nevertheless happen despite the authorized procedures in place. Unintentional torts are when someone or something is harmed without intending to do so. This part of the paper will examine an unintentional tort case where sensitive data was compromised as a result of an authorization procedure error. In order to reduce unintended torts, the paper will also address how authorization procedures might be improved. And also, this part of paper will explore the importance of informed consent in medical practice and the legal implications of failing to obtain it.
Information can be protected, and inadvertent torts can be avoided by using authorization techniques. The case study focuses on a healthcare firm that unintentionally leaked private data. To safeguard sensitive information, such as patient medical records, the healthcare institution had put in place authorized systems. Staff employees have to provide their login information in order to be authorized to access patient medical records. On the basis of the need-to-know principle, the healthcare organization also has measures in place to limit access to private data. Nevertheless, despite these authorized procedures, private data was mistakenly divulged. Unintentionally, a member of the administrative staff forwarded an email to an unapproved recipient that contained patient medical records. The unapproved recipient has no business seeing patient medical records because they were not an employee of the healthcare facility. When the uninvited recipient alerted the healthcare organization, they were made aware of the unintended disclosure of important information. To ascertain the reason for the unintended leak of sensitive material, the healthcare organization quickly started an inquiry. The results of the investigation showed that the administrative employee had violated the healthcare organization's regulations regarding the management of confidential information. The member of the administrative staff neglected to confirm the receiver's identity and did not make sure the recipient had a valid purpose for gaining access to patient medical records. The healthcare organization suffered severe damage as a result of the unintended publication of sensitive information. The inquiry, notifying those affected, and legal fees came at a great cost to the healthcare institution. Additionally, the healthcare organization's reputation took a hit, and some patients lost faith in its capacity to safeguard their private information.
The case study emphasizes how critical it is to create reliable authorization procedures in order to protect sensitive data. To safeguard sensitive information, the healthcare company has put in place authorization procedures, such as login passwords and need-to-know policies. However, the unintended disclosure of private data illustrates that authorization procedures alone cannot stop unintentional torts. Organizations must put additional precautions in place, such as staff training on handling sensitive information, to prevent unintended torts. By providing staff employees with training on how to handle sensitive information, the healthcare institution in the case study may have avoided the unintended leak of sensitive information. The instruction may have covered handling sensitive information securely as well as how to confirm the recipient's identity and determine whether they have a valid purpose for requesting access. Implementing a data loss prevention (DLP) solution is another precaution that could have avoided the unintended leak of sensitive information. By detecting and stopping the unlawful transfer of sensitive information, DLP systems can aid in the prevention of unintentional torts. DLP tools can also track and notify businesses of any unauthorized access to sensitive data. As a result, a company may suffer serious consequences if sensitive information is unintentionally released. Sensitive information must be protected by authorization techniques, such as login credentials and policies based on the need-to-know principle. However, using authorization techniques alone is insufficient to stop inadvertent torts. To prevent unintended torts, organizations must take further steps, such as teaching personnel how to handle sensitive information and deploying DLP solutions. Organizations can lower their risk of unintended torts and safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized access by putting these procedures in place.
Informed consent is a crucial aspect of medical practice that ensures patients can make informed decisions about their health care. Medical professionals are legally required to obtain informed consent from their patients before performing any medical procedure or treatment. The importance of informed consent lies in protecting the patient's autonomy and right to make decisions about their health care. Without informed consent, patients would be forced to undergo medical procedures and treatments without their knowledge or consent, violating their fundamental rights. Medical professionals who fail to obtain informed consent can face legal consequences, including charges of assault and medical malpractice. The unintentional tort is a legal wrong committed unintentionally or without malice. Medical malpractice is a type of unintentional tort that occurs when a medical professional breaches the standard of care, causing harm to a patient. Failure to obtain informed consent is one example of medical malpractice, and it can result in legal consequences for medical professionals.
One landmark case that illustrates the importance of informed consent and the legal consequences of failing to obtain it is Canterbury v. Spence (1972). In this case, Mr. Canterbury underwent spinal surgery to relieve pain in his lower back, which resulted in permanent paralysis of his legs. Mr. Canterbury sued Dr. Spence, the surgeon who performed the procedure, for medical malpractice. During the trial, it was revealed that Dr. Spence had failed to obtain informed consent from Mr. Canterbury. Dr. Spence had provided Mr. Canterbury with a general description of the surgery and had yet to inform him of the risks involved. Additionally, Dr. Spence had not provided Mr. Canterbury with information about alternative treatment options. The court found Dr. Spence guilty of medical malpractice and awarded Mr. Canterbury damages. The court held that Dr. Spence had a duty to obtain informed consent from Mr. Canterbury and that his failure to do so constituted medical malpractice. The court also held that the failure to obtain informed consent violated Mr. Canterbury's fundamental right to make decisions about his health care. Informed consent is not just a legal requirement but an ethical imperative. Medical professionals must obtain informed consent from their patients before any medical procedure or treatment is undertaken to avoid legal consequences. Informed consent involves giving patients adequate information about their health condition, treatment options, risks, and benefits. The medical professional must also ensure that the patient fully understands the information provided and can make an informed decision about their health care. Informed consent is a dynamic and ongoing process requiring medical professionals to communicate continuously with their patients throughout treatment. The medical professional must also ensure that the patient's decision is voluntary and not coerced. Patients can refuse treatment even if it may be in their best interest. In some cases, obtaining informed consent may be challenging. For example, patients who lack capacity may be unable to provide informed consent. In such cases, medical professionals must follow legal and ethical guidelines to obtain consent from the patient's legal representative or surrogate decision-maker. Medical professionals must also ensure that they provide adequate information to the legal representative or surrogate decision-maker to make an informed decision about the patient's health care.
In conclusion, informed consent is a fundamental aspect of medical practice that protects patients' autonomy and right to make decisions about their health care. Failure to obtain informed consent can result in legal consequences for medical professionals, including charges of assault and medical malpractice. The case of Canterbury v. Spence illustrates the importance of informed consent and the legal implications of failing to obtain it. Medical professionals must obtain informed consent from their patients before any medical procedure or treatment is undertaken to avoid legal consequences. Medical professionals must also ensure that they provide adequate information to patients, including risks and benefits when seeking informed consent. This involves a dynamic and ongoing communication process between the medical professional and the patient, which requires precise and accurate information that the patient can understand. Informed consent is a legal requirement and an ethical responsibility for medical professionals. It upholds the principle of respect for patient autonomy and promotes patient-centered care. Patients have the right to decide about their health care and must be given the information they need to make informed decisions. In cases where obtaining informed consent is challenging, medical professionals must follow legal and ethical guidelines to obtain valid consent from the patient's legal representative or surrogate decision-maker. Medical professionals must also ensure that the legal representative or surrogate decision-maker is adequately informed to make an informed decision about the patient's health care. Overall, informed consent is a critical aspect of medical practice that ensures patients are given the information they need to make informed decisions about their health care. Medical professionals have a legal and ethical responsibility to obtain informed consent from their patients and provide them with the information they need to make informed decisions. Failure to obtain informed consent can result in legal consequences, including charges of assault and medical malpractice, and undermine patient trust and confidence in the medical profession.
Summarize above essay .
Accounting Information Systems
ISBN: 978-1133935940
10th edition
Authors: Ulric J. Gelinas, Richard B. Dull