Miranda v. Arizona established the intent requirement in an armed robbery case. A)True B)False Marty sold...

Transcribed Image Text:

Miranda v. Arizona established the intent requirement in an armed robbery case. A)True B)False Marty sold an air conditioner to Paula, telling her it would cool a 200-square-foot area, even though he knew it would effectively cool only about one-third of that space. Marty is liable for the intentional tort of fraud. A)True B)False Damon, driving under the influence, causes a car accident that results in the death of Tom. Damon is arrested and charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than a year. This crime is A)a misdemeanor. B)a felony. C)a civil wrong. D)a tort. Miranda v. Arizona established the intent requirement in an armed robbery case. A)True B)False Marty sold an air conditioner to Paula, telling her it would cool a 200-square-foot area, even though he knew it would effectively cool only about one-third of that space. Marty is liable for the intentional tort of fraud. A)True B)False Damon, driving under the influence, causes a car accident that results in the death of Tom. Damon is arrested and charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than a year. This crime is A)a misdemeanor. B)a felony. C)a civil wrong. D)a tort.