Question: Modern Developments So doctrinally, there is a distinction between ? Promises to pay more for the same ? A ?practical benefit? may qualify as sufficient

Modern Developments So doctrinally, there is a distinction between ? Promises to pay more for the same ? A ?practical benefit? may qualify as sufficient consideration. ? But precise definition of ?practical benefit? remains elusive and not every threat to breach counts as duress. ? UBC (Construction) Ltd v. Sung Foo Kee Ltd [1993] 2 HKLR 207, [1993] 2 HKC 458 ? Promises to accept less for the same ? A ?practical benefit? may qualify as sufficient consideration ? But ?practical benefit? here c

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!