Moore's Law Is Dead Moores law is named after Intel cofounderGordon Moore. He observed in 1965 that
Question:
Moore's Law Is Dead Moore’s law is named after Intel cofounderGordon Moore. He observed in 1965 that transistors were shrinkingso fast that every year, twice as many could fit onto a chip, andin 1975, he adjusted the pace to a doubling every 2 years. The chipindustry has kept Moore’s prediction alive, with Intel leading thecharge. And computing companies have found plenty to do with thecontinual supply of extra transistors. Mobile apps, video games,spreadsheets, and accurate weather forecasts: that’s just asampling of the life-changing things made possible by the reliable,exponential growth in the power of computer chips over the past 5decades. But in a few years, technology companies may have to workharder to bring us advanced new-use cases for computers. Thecontinual cramming of more silicon transistors onto chips, known asMoore’s law, has been the feedstock of exuberant innovation incomputing. Now it looks to be slowing to a halt. The last few yearshave shown a stagnation on chip development, and that is bad newsfor research programs reliant on supercomputers, such as efforts tounderstand climate change, develop new materials for batteries andsuperconductors, and improve drug design. Intel recently pushedback its next transistor technology and has also decided toincrease the time between future generations. And a technology roadmap for Moore’s law maintained by an industry group, including theworld’s largest chip makers, is being scrapped. Intel has suggestedsilicon transistors can keep shrinking only for another 5 years.The world’s top supercomputers aren’t getting better at the ratethey used to and are already feeling the effects of Moore’s law’send times. Mobile devices are powered by chips made by companiesother than Intel, and they've generally been slightly behind intransistor technology. However, many useful things that mobiledevices can do rest on the power of billion-dollar data centers,where the end of Moore’s law would be a more immediate headache.Companies such as Google and Microsoft eagerly gobble up every newgeneration of the most advanced chips, packed more densely withtransistors. Alternative ways to get more computing power includeworking harder to improve the design of chips and making chipsspecialized to accelerate particular crucial algorithms. The comingplateau in transistor density will stir more interest in redrawingthe basic architecture of computers among supercomputer anddata-center designers. Getting rid of certain design featuresdating from the 1940s could unlock huge efficiency gains. Yettaking advantage of those would require rethinking the design ofmany types of software, and would require programmers to changetheir habits.17 Questions 1. Do you agree or disagree that Moore'slaw is coming to an end? 2. What will happen to the businessenvironment if Moore's law does die? 3. What can companies do toremain competitive when hardware advances are not driving thecompanies forward? 4. summarize the paragraph in a shortsentence