Question: Multiple Choice 1 - 1 0 ( 3 0 points ) Testimony about statements made by a person to show that the person was mentally
Multiple Choice points
Testimony about statements made by a person to show that the person was mentally ill are a not hearsay b hearsay hearsay but are admissible because of the indicia of reliability are excludable under the case law e none of the above
The Constitution's
Clause and rule against hearsay protect similar values. A selfincrimination b ex post facto confrontation confirmation e none of the above
To fall within the hearsay rule, the testimony must be offered to prove the a credibility of the witness truth of the matter asserted in the statement the credibility of the declarant unavailability of the declarant e none of the above
The primary purpose of judicial notice is to a protect the rights of defendants b assure a fair trial for both parties give the judge more control over the proceedings save time and effort e none of the above
The Privilege against self incrimination is found in the a Declaration of Independence b Fifth Amendment c Fourth Amendment d 'Sixth Amendment e none of the above
Which of the following is a firmly rooted hearsay exception in the law of evidence? A personal diaries b statement of the accomplice c excited utterance
d statements made while mentally incompetent e none of the above
Statements offered to prove which of the following would be hearsay? A no knowledge of any information possessed by the defendant b the declarant's state of mind c the effect of the statement on the hearer the declarant was told by the defendant's mother that she saw the defendant pull the trigger and fire the fatal shot e none of the above
The problem with hearsay testimony is that the person who actually saw the events a may be dead is not on the witness stand cannot be subpoenaed may have a privilege against selfincrimination e none of the above
The US Supreme Court made the federal exclusionary rule mandatory for state courts in: a Mapp v Ohio b Weeks v US c Miranda v Arizona d Settles v Arizona e none of the above
The statement by a shooting victim just before they die would probably be admissible under the hearsay exception for a victim statements b murder witnesses c statements for descriptions of present mental condition d dying declarations e none of the above
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
