Question: Multiple Choice 1 - 1 0 ( 3 0 points ) Testimony about statements made by a person to show that the person was mentally

Multiple Choice 1-10(30 points)
Testimony about statements made by a person to show that the person was mentally ill are a. not hearsay b. hearsay c. hearsay but are admissible because of the indicia of reliability d. are excludable under the case law e. none of the above
The Constitution's
Clause and rule against hearsay protect similar values. A. self-incrimination b. ex post facto c. confrontation d. confirmation e. none of the above
To fall within the hearsay rule, the testimony must be offered to prove the a. credibility of the witness b. truth of the matter asserted in the statement c. the credibility of the declarant d. unavailability of the declarant e. none of the above
The primary purpose of judicial notice is to a. protect the rights of defendants b. assure a fair trial for both parties c. give the judge more control over the proceedings d. save time and effort e. none of the above
The Privilege against self incrimination is found in the a. Declaration of Independence b. Fifth Amendment c. Fourth Amendment d. 'Sixth Amendment e. none of the above
Which of the following is a firmly rooted hearsay exception in the law of evidence? A. personal diaries b. statement of the accomplice c. excited utterance
d. statements made while mentally incompetent e. none of the above
Statements offered to prove which of the following would be hearsay? A. no knowledge of any information possessed by the defendant b. the declarant's state of mind c. the effect of the statement on the hearer d. the declarant was told by the defendant's mother that she saw the defendant pull the trigger and fire the fatal shot e. none of the above
The problem with hearsay testimony is that the person who actually saw the events a. may be dead b. is not on the witness stand c. cannot be subpoenaed d. may have a privilege against self-incrimination e. none of the above
The US Supreme Court made the federal exclusionary rule mandatory for state courts in: a. Mapp v. Ohio b. Weeks v. U.S. c. Miranda v. Arizona d. Settles v. Arizona e. none of the above
The statement by a shooting victim just before they die would probably be admissible under the hearsay exception for a. victim statements b. murder witnesses c. statements for descriptions of present mental condition d. dying declarations e. none of the above
 Multiple Choice 1-10(30 points) Testimony about statements made by a person

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!