Multiple Select Question

Select all that apply

What is the Court's ANALYSIS $($legal reasoning$)$ in the United States v Anderson case? $($Choose TWO correct answers$)$

Given all the evidence a trier of fact could not have found all three elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud were beyond a reasonable doubt.

A trier of fact could have found only two elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud were proven by a preponderance of the evidence.

Both spouses were making material misrepresentations and the record is replete with similar evidence.

Given all the evidence, a rational trier of fact could have found all three elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud beyond a reasonable doubt.