Multiple Select Question

$)$

Select all that apply

What was the court's ANALYSIS $($legal reasoning$)$ in the Black v William Insulation case? $($Check TWO correct answers$)$

A ten$-$hour shift within a twenty$-$four$-$hour period is not, on its face, an objectively unreasonable period of work

Black contends that the accident was an unforeseeable consequence of WIC's conduct

Causation necessitates a showing that Ibarra$-$Viernes's weekly work schedule was a substantial contributing factor to his fatigue

Black contends that even with employer supplied bus transport, it was unforeseeable that Ibarra$-$Viernes would cause injury to other drivers