Note: . Here, we are not comparing TRAK with an organization like Target, because Target is not much into the earth-moving equipment/vehicles industry. We would consider a comparison between TRAK and companies such as Deere & Company, Hitachi, and Komatsu to be a better comparison as these firms can be viewed as direct competitors within the earth-moving equipment/vehicles' industry Recall that in this course, we consider different (multiple) perspectives such as geographic scope, range of products/services, and target market before deciding whether the scope of competition is broad or narrow The answer choices for this question are taken/adapted from the scenario Question: Porter's strategy framework suggests that a company choose one of two types of competitive scope (ie, narrow or broad). Select the choice that supports the claim that TRAK is adopting a broad scope of competition within the earth moving equipment/vehicles industry. Question: Porter's strategy framework suggests that a company choose one of two types of competitive scope (i.e., narrow or broad). Select the choice that supports the claim that TRAK is adopting a broad scope of competition within the 'earth moving equipment/vehicles industry. O a. TRAK is considered to be a global leader with several customers, plants, and competitors distributed all over the world. O b. TRAK sells a broad range of products and Nervices O C. Statements a, and b both can imply that TRAK is competing on a broad scope within the earth-moving equipment/vehicle industry