Question: *Note that the table below gives shipping costs per 1000 units in USD ($) To Amarillo Teaneck Chicago Sioux Falls From Sunnyvale 250 420 380
*Note that the table below gives shipping costs per 1000 units in USD ($)
| To | |||||
| Amarillo | Teaneck | Chicago | Sioux Falls | ||
| From | Sunnyvale | 250 | 420 | 380 | 280 |
| Dublin | 1280 | 990 | 1440 | 1520 | |
| Bangkok | 1550 | 1420 | 1660 | 1730 | |
*Note that the table below shows the production requirements for the manufacturing plants and the shipping requirements for the warehouses
| Plant | Production | Warehouse | Requirement |
| Sunnyvale | 60 | Amarillo | 100 |
| Dublin | 145 | Teaneck | 84 |
| Bangkok | 125 | Chicago | 77 |
| Sioux Falls | 69 |
Where:
m = total # plants
n = total # warehouses
i = plant #
j = warehouse #
c = unit cost of shipping one product from plant i to warehouse j
x = # of products flowed from plant i to warehouse j
(1) Use the greedy heuristic to solve this problem. Calculate the total cost.
(2) Use the EXCEL Solver to solve this problem. Calculate the total cost. (provide a screenshot of your EXCEL results)
(3) Assuming that the following routes are eliminated: Sunnyvale to Teaneck, Dublin to Chicago, and Bangkok to Amarillo. Solve again using your EXCEL Solver. What is the percentage increase in total shipping costs at the optimal solution due to the elimination of these routes? (provide a screenshot of your EXCEL results)
(4) Assume the production in Sunnyvale has been reduced from 60 to 40. For this unbalanced problem, write out the seven constraints for linear programming.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
