Objectives Alternatives Keep Current Update Website Contract Out Website In-House New Website Cost estimate $0 $2,500 $10,000 Number of clicks Low (1); few Moderate (2); High (3); create on website people click on more clicks on interactive content (scale 1-3, website content website content, elements that 1= low) create a few encourage clicks interactive links Estimated $0 $500 per year $5,000 per year increase in donations Ease of use for Very Bad (1); Somewhat Bad Very Good (5); clients of our clients often (2); we can fix the contractor services complain about some elements will streamline (scale 1-5, 1 being how difficult it is in house all of our client very bad, and 5 to use forms and very good) processes Professionalization OK (3); it looks OK (3); we Very good (5); of Appearance OK but just isn't wouldn't change the contractor (scale 1-5, 1 being functional the look much, will update the not at all just try to overall look to professional, 5 increase make it very being very functionality professional professional) are part of the leadership team of a nonprofit that is considering getting a new website. Use consequence table to respond to the following questions. The nonprofit is willing to think about net costs in terms of the first year of launching the website, where they consider both the cost to implement and the benefits of extra donations. Apply the even swap method to eliminate one of the objectives. Show the new consequence table. Calculate the unweighted uniform utility for each of the objectives and then apply the additive linear model to come up with a recommended decision. Submit a consequence table where you have converted all of the values to their uniform utility (in Excel or Word), and then provide your recommendation (in text response) for which alternative to select. What are potential sources of uncertainty and risk that might exist for the nonprofit's decision to build a new website? How does the consequence table for the nonprofit's website deal with uncertainty? Objectives Alternatives Keep Current Update Website Contract Out Website In-House New Website Cost estimate $0 $2,500 $10,000 Number of clicks Low (1); few Moderate (2); High (3); create on website people click on more clicks on interactive content (scale 1-3, website content website content, elements that 1= low) create a few encourage clicks interactive links Estimated $0 $500 per year $5,000 per year increase in donations Ease of use for Very Bad (1); Somewhat Bad Very Good (5); clients of our clients often (2); we can fix the contractor services complain about some elements will streamline (scale 1-5, 1 being how difficult it is in house all of our client very bad, and 5 to use forms and very good) processes Professionalization OK (3); it looks OK (3); we Very good (5); of Appearance OK but just isn't wouldn't change the contractor (scale 1-5, 1 being functional the look much, will update the not at all just try to overall look to professional, 5 increase make it very being very functionality professional professional) are part of the leadership team of a nonprofit that is considering getting a new website. Use consequence table to respond to the following questions. The nonprofit is willing to think about net costs in terms of the first year of launching the website, where they consider both the cost to implement and the benefits of extra donations. Apply the even swap method to eliminate one of the objectives. Show the new consequence table. Calculate the unweighted uniform utility for each of the objectives and then apply the additive linear model to come up with a recommended decision. Submit a consequence table where you have converted all of the values to their uniform utility (in Excel or Word), and then provide your recommendation (in text response) for which alternative to select. What are potential sources of uncertainty and risk that might exist for the nonprofit's decision to build a new website? How does the consequence table for the nonprofit's website deal with uncertainty