Question: On Civil Engineering major Identify what side 2 argues. Support this argument by a source/article. DO NOT JUST SUMMARIZE (Summary = repeating the ideas from
On Civil Engineering major
- Identify what side 2 argues.
- Support this argument by a source/article.
- DO NOT JUST SUMMARIZE (Summary = repeating the ideas from the source and telling us "what it says"). Summary is useful, but then dig deeper. Analysis focuses on
- HOW the argument is made. Use the Argument techquies to explain what the author does to construct their argument and how they argue their point.
- HOW DOES BUILD TRUST OR CREDIBILITY? (ETHOS)
- HOW DOES PROVE OR SUPPORT THEIR CLAIM? (LOGOS)
- HOW DOES THE USE EMOTION TO SWAY THE AUDIENCE REACTION? (PATHOS)
- HOW DOES ORGANIZE THE ARGUMENT?
- HOW DOES CONCEDE OR ADDRESS THE OPPOSITION?
- WHY makes these choices. This is where your critical thinking skills and interpretation comes in. What do you think this side values? What are their biases or assumptions about the issue? Why do they believe in this argument? What are their goals or intentions?
- WHY DID THINK THE AUDIENCE WOULD TRUST THEM?
- WHY DID BELIEVE THIS WAS THE BEST EVIDENCE/PROOF TO CHOOSE?
- WHY DOES BELIEVE THE AUDIENCE SHOULD FEEL A CERTAIN WAY?
- WHY DOES ASSUME CERTAIN THINGS TO BE TRUE?
- WHY DOES
- BELIEVE THEIR CHOICES WILL GET THE AUDIENCE TO REACT THE WAY THEY WANT THEM TO?
- WHY is this side/community responding to the issues presented by side 1? How are their ideas based on the existing argument?
Please help as descriptive writing style.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
