only answer question 2 for critical thinking

and also question #2 for review question

UN Syam What sort of legal, ethical, and social issues are raised when creating a robo- advice type of system? Do the builders of such a robo-advice system owe a special duty or responsibility to its users? Critical Thinking Questions The members of the field trial team are gathered to discuss their findings and develop conclusions in advance of a meeting next week with the firm's senior man- agement team. Just 10 minutes into the meeting, it is clear that none of the field trial team members feels confident that the new service is offering sound advice. However, some members of the trial team argue that the roll-out of the service should commence as planned; they maintain that problems can be identified and fixed as more users come on board and the firm gains more experience working with investors and the robo-advice system. Their rationale is based at least in part on self-survival to recommend against roll-out is probably a career-ending move, as the firm has already invested so much in the program, which it has already begun promoting to customers. Others members of the team argue that the product is simply not ready for large-scale use. They argue that the current system should be scrapped and the firm should forget about the idea of a robo-advice service. 1. Are there other alternative strategies for the robo-advice service that make sense? Which approach would you recommend and why? ! 2. How might you present your approach to senior management in such a way that it has a good chance of being accepted-and that the risk to your future employment is minimized? UN Syam What sort of legal, ethical, and social issues are raised when creating a robo- advice type of system? Do the builders of such a robo-advice system owe a special duty or responsibility to its users? Critical Thinking Questions The members of the field trial team are gathered to discuss their findings and develop conclusions in advance of a meeting next week with the firm's senior man- agement team. Just 10 minutes into the meeting, it is clear that none of the field trial team members feels confident that the new service is offering sound advice. However, some members of the trial team argue that the roll-out of the service should commence as planned; they maintain that problems can be identified and fixed as more users come on board and the firm gains more experience working with investors and the robo-advice system. Their rationale is based at least in part on self-survival to recommend against roll-out is probably a career-ending move, as the firm has already invested so much in the program, which it has already begun promoting to customers. Others members of the team argue that the product is simply not ready for large-scale use. They argue that the current system should be scrapped and the firm should forget about the idea of a robo-advice service. 1. Are there other alternative strategies for the robo-advice service that make sense? Which approach would you recommend and why? ! 2. How might you present your approach to senior management in such a way that it has a good chance of being accepted-and that the risk to your future employment is minimized