Original post what is something interesting you learned from reading these rules?

Original post what is something unsettling you learned from reading these rules? Rule 402: relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: The United States Constitution, a federal statute, these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. Irrelevant evidence is not admissible. Rule 401: test for relevant evidence. Evidence is relevant if: it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without evidence; and the fact is of consequence in determining the action. Rule 403: excluding relevant evidence for prejudice, confusion, waste of time, or other reasons. The court may exclude relevant evidence if it's probative value is substantially outweighed by danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence