Our assessment methods were the integrity Test, Cognitive Ability Test, Conscientiousness, and Job Knowledge. We choose the compensatory approach because to its adaptability, which enables an evaluation procedure that is flexible enough to acknowledge candidates' diverse strengths and limitations and allow for the use of strong performance in one area to counterbalance weaker performance in another. By taking into account all assessment techniques and their relative weights, this method allows for a more thorough review and provides a balanced picture of each candidate's qualifications and role fit. It is considered fair since it evaluates candidates' overall performance using all available methods, rather than eliminating them solely on a single poor score. Moreover, each assessment method's weighting corresponds with its significance to the job requirements, guaranteeing that the hiring choice will give priority to the most important aspects of job performance. B. What weights should each assessment score receive when calculating each candidate's overall score