Question: Page 3 - 5 = Case Study #1 (case study 3 sexual harassment)- Do not put any HISTORY or Background of the case! Instead, introduce

Page 3 - 5 = Case Study #1 (case study 3 sexual harassment)- Do not put any HISTORY or Background of the case! Instead, introduce the problem, the reason for the lawsuit, solutions, outcomes and create the precedence needed to win the case. Explain why your information should be used as precedence for the case. What could be a solution to the problem? Explain why it would work as if you were the judge. Include a REFERENCE LIST at the end of the Case Study to show the articles you used as precedence.Page 3 - 5 = Case Study #1 (case study 3 sexual

33.1 Sexual Harassment The Pennsylva- nia State Police (PSP) hired Nancy Drew Suders as a police communications operator for the MeConnellsburg barracks. Suders's supervisors were Sergeant Eric D. Easton, station commander at the McConnellsburg barracks; Patrol Corporal William D. Baker; and Corporal Eric B. Prendergast. These 3 supervisors subjected Suders to a continuous bar- rage of sexual harassment that ceased only when she resigned from the force. Easton would bring up the sub- ject of people having sex with animals each time Sud- ers entered his office. He told Prendergast, in front of Suders, that young girls should be given instruction in how to gratify men with oral sex. Easton would also sit down near Suders, wearing Spandex shorts, and spread his legs apart. Baker repeatedly made obscene gestures in Suders's presence and shouted out vulgar comments inviting sex. Baker made these gestures as many as 5 to 10 times per night throughout Suders's employment at the barracks. Further, Baker would rub his rear end in front of her and remark I have a nice ass, don't I? Five months after being hired, Suders contacted Vir- ginia Smith-Elliot, PSP's equal opportunity officer, and stated that she was being harassed at work and was afraid. Smith-Elliot's response appeared to Suders to be insensi- tive and unhelpful. Two days later, Suders resigned from the force. Suders sued PSP, alleging that she had been subjected to sexual harassment and constructively dis- charged and forced to resign. The employer argued that Suders should not be allowed to bring her case because she had resigned. Can Suders prevail on her sexual harassment claim? Pennsylvania State Police v. Sud

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!