Part Four $(20)$: Answer the following question. Where appropriate, show all of your work. $1.$ The #metoo movement has drawn considerable attention in the past few years, particularly in terms of how the United States addresses issues relating to sexual assault and sexual harassment. A political scientist interested in how Americans evaluate the #metoo movement uses data from the $2020$ American National Election Study $($ANES$)$ to estimate the following model: #metoo feeling thermometer $=$ a $+$ b$1($Partisan identification$)+$ b$2($Ideological conservatism$)+$ b$3($FT: feminists$)+$ b$4($Women are discrimination victims$)+$ b$5($Men are discrimination victims$)+$ b$6($Education$)+$ b$7($Household income$)+$ b$8($Gender$)+$ b$9($Age$)$ where #metoo feeling thermometer is the feeling thermometer score for the #metoo movement, ranging from $0($for those with very negative feelings$)$ to $50($for those who are neutral$)$ to $100($for those with very favorable feelings$)$; partisan identification is a seven$-$point scale of partisan identification, ranging from $0($for strong Democrats$)$ to $6($for strong Republicans$)$; ideological conservatism is a seven$-$point scale, ranging from $0($for strong liberals$)$ to $6($for strong conservatives$)$; FT: feminists is the feeling thermometer score for feminists, ranging from $0($for those with very negative feelings$)$ to $100($for those with very positive feelings$)$; Women are discrimination victims is a five$-$point scale, ranging from $0($no discrimination at all$)$ to $4($a great deal of discrimination$)$; Men are discrimination victims is a five$-$point scale, ranging from $0($no discrimination at all$)$ to $4($a great deal of discrimination$)$; Education is a five$-$point scale, ranging from $0($less than high school degree$)$ to $4($graduate degree$)$; Household income is a $22-$point scale, ranging from $0($household income less than $$10$K$)$ to $21($household income greater than $$250$K$)$; Gender is a dichotomous variable, coded $1$ for women and $0$ for men; and Age represents the respondents$$ age, in years. Based on his estimation of this model using OLS regression, the following results $($with expected direction of the coefficients in brackets$)$ are obtained: Variable b se z prob. $-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------$ Partisan identification $[-]-1\mathrm{.}7910\mathrm{.}206-8\mathrm{.}710\mathrm{.}000-0\mathrm{.}137$ Ideological conservatism $[-]-1\mathrm{.}9330\mathrm{.}291-6\mathrm{.}640\mathrm{.}000-0\mathrm{.}110$ FT: feminists $[+]0\mathrm{.}5020\mathrm{.}01435\mathrm{.}100\mathrm{.}0000\mathrm{.}457$ Women discrimination victims $[+]3\mathrm{.}6340\mathrm{.}34110\mathrm{.}670\mathrm{.}0000\mathrm{.}122$ Men discrimination victims $[-]-2\mathrm{.}7860\mathrm{.}348-8\mathrm{.}010\mathrm{.}000-0\mathrm{.}085$ Education $[+]-0\mathrm{.}0370\mathrm{.}297-0\mathrm{.}130\mathrm{.}900-0\mathrm{.}001$ Household income $[-]-0\mathrm{.}0440\mathrm{.}047-0\mathrm{.}930\mathrm{.}352-0\mathrm{.}010$ Gender $[+]2\mathrm{.}9460\mathrm{.}5885\mathrm{.}010\mathrm{.}0000\mathrm{.}049$ Age $[-]-0\mathrm{.}1240\mathrm{.}017-7\mathrm{.}110\mathrm{.}000-0\mathrm{.}070$ Intercept $40\mathrm{.}6661\mathrm{.}90421\mathrm{.}350\mathrm{.}0000----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------$ F ratio $=666\mathrm{.}95$ Prob $($F$)=0\mathrm{.}0000$ R$-$squared $=0\mathrm{.}5535$ N $=4,853[$continued on next page$]$ a$.$ Interpret the empirical results derived from this regression model, both statistically and substantively. What variables are systematically related to feelings toward the #metoo movement? What variables are unrelated? How does one interpret each of the coefficients? How well does the overall model explain feelings toward the #metoo movement in the United States in $2020?$ b$.$ What is the predicted feeling thermometer score for the #metoo movement feeling thermometer variable, given the following configurations of scores on each variable for two individuals? How would you interpret these predicted values? Person # $12$ Partisan identification $33$ Ideological conservatism $33$ FT: feminists $5050$ Women discrimination victims $40$ Men discrimination victims $04$ Education $22$ Household income $1111$ Gender $11$ Age $5050$