Part III: 1. Proofs, Arguments and Audience: Construct a version of a Gaunilo-style counter-argument to St. Anselm's proof for the existence of God (as presented in the Week 5 powerpoint slides). Explain why the argument you've constructed is valid, and explain why you think your conclusion is false. Explain further how this argument is not a straightforward proof on non-consequence. Present this argument as two different informal proofs. In the first, assume that I, and your TAs are already familiar with Anselm's argument (10 Points). In the second assume that you are presenting your argument to a person unfamiliar with Anselm's original argument (20 Points). Part III: 1. Proofs, Arguments and Audience: Construct a version of a Gaunilo-style counter-argument to St. Anselm's proof for the existence of God (as presented in the Week 5 powerpoint slides). Explain why the argument you've constructed is valid, and explain why you think your conclusion is false. Explain further how this argument is not a straightforward proof on non-consequence. Present this argument as two different informal proofs. In the first, assume that I, and your TAs are already familiar with Anselm's argument (10 Points). In the second assume that you are presenting your argument to a person unfamiliar with Anselm's original argument (20 Points)