Question: People v . Sisuphan, 1 8 1 Cal. App . 4 th 8 0 0 , 1 0 4 Cal. Rptr . 3 d 6

People v. Sisuphan, 181 Cal. App.4th 800,104 Cal. Rptr.3d 654(2010)
An employee of Toyota was accused of embezzlement. This employee claimed he had another intent and it was not to steal the money. What was the result of the employee's claim and his defense? What was the Court's decision on Appeal?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!