please answer all 3 answer asap

1) In the discussion about the Merck case, the firm is confronted by difficult situations in regard to life-saving drugs. In the two situations stated in the case, give me your assessment of Merck's consideration of various stakeholders in relation to their future. 2)The chapter lists 4 components of corporate social responsibility. Looking at those 4 elements, do you agree that public firms should address all 4 elements? Why or why not? If not, where do you propose the firm "draw the line"? Give an example and explain your logic accordingly. 3)The text discusses trade-offs that are different than between Walmart and Nordstrom even though they are basically in the same industry. Think of another industry and select two firms that have made very different actions for these types of trade-offs. Explain in detail the differences in the two firms you chose. Specifically....what type of trade-off decisions have these firms made? Be specific and cite valid examples