please answer both questions

1) In the discussion about the Merck case, the firm is confronted by difficult situations in regard to life-saving drugs. In the two situations stated in the case,give me your assessment of Merck's consideration of various stakeholders in relation to their future. 2)The chapter lists 4 components of corporate social responsibility. Looking at those 4 elements, do you agree that public firms should address all 4 elements? Why or why not? If not, where do you propose the firm "draw the line"? Give an example and explain your logic accordingly. 1) In the discussion about the Merck case, the firm is confronted by difficult situations in regard to life-saving drugs. In the two situations stated in the case,give me your assessment of Merck's consideration of various stakeholders in relation to their future. 2)The chapter lists 4 components of corporate social responsibility. Looking at those 4 elements, do you agree that public firms should address all 4 elements? Why or why not? If not, where do you propose the firm "draw the line"? Give an example and explain your logic accordingly