please answer fast

Listen Kathy fired Dave. Subsequently, Dave applied for a job at Gervais, Inc. The director of human resources at Gervais called Kathy and asked about Dave's job performance. Kathy told Gervais that Dave was fired for sexual harassment after four employees had filed complaints against him. In fact, no sexual harassment complaints had been fired against Dave - he was fired for bringing a weapon to work, but Kathy had confused him with another employee fired the same day. Can Dave successfully sue Kathy for defamation of character? 1) No, because the statement was not fact, only Kathy's opinion. 2) Yes, because the statement was false and published. 3) No, because the statement was not published. 4) Yes, because Kathy acted with actual malice. Question 70 (1 point) Listen 51 54 Cullen pointed an unloaded gun at Nicki and threatened to shoot her. Nicki, believing the gun to be loaded, became very frightened and begged him not to shoot her. Cullen's actions do not constitute assault because the gun was not loaded. True 57 False Listen While shopping at a local pharmacy, a clerk thought Melanie put two boxes from the "Cold and Allergy" aisle into her purse. The manager accused her of shoplifting and escorted her to his office. When Melanie voluntarily dumped the contents of her purse and coat pockets onto his desk, the manager saw that she did not have any medications, and immediately let her go, apologizing for the "mistake." Melanie has sued the pharmacy for false imprisonment and the pharmacy has argued that the state merchant protection statute protects it from liability. Which of the following would probably be true in this instance? 1) When the manager stopped and detained her, he had reasonable grounds to believe that Melanie had shoplifted from the pharmacy 2) The manager investigated the incident in a reasonable manner. 3) The manager detained Melanie for only a reasonable time. 4) All the above are necessary for the pharmacy to avoid liability. Question 72(1 point)