Please answer the following question,

John Doe started receiving his disability benefits under the Disability Insurance Benefits program in 2010. In March 2014, he received a questionnaire from the state agency charged with monitoring his medical condition. John completed the questionnaire, stating that his condition had not improved, and provided information on his recent doctor's visits. The state agency then obtained reports from his physician and a psychiatric consultant. After reviewing all the documents submitted, the agency informed John by letter with reasons that it had made a tentative determination that his disability had ceased in May 2014. In his written response, John disputed one characterization of his medical condition and indicated that the agency already had enough evidence to establish his disability. The state agency then made its final determination that he had ceased to be disabled in May 2014. The determination was accepted by the Social Security Administration (SSA), which notified John in July that his benefits would terminate after that month. The notification also advised him of his right to seek reconsideration by the state agency of this initial determination within six months. John sued the state agency and SSA, challenging the constitutional validity of the administrative procedures. John relied on Goldberg v. Kelly, which established a right to an "evidentiary hearing" prior to termination of welfare benefits. Will John win this case? Provide your legal opinion on this case using the IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion).

You may also refer to the following cases:

Goldberg v. Kelly

Mathews v Eldridge