Please answer the following questions down below with specific details and evidence to support your answer:

1.So from Humes point of view, if the architect did not do better and get things right in the first place, what would we say about the architect?

2.. So from Humes point of view, if God is the architect of the world, and we would blame the architect for that house in the paragraph above, then, in the light of these destructive forces, what should we conclude about God?

3.If you had the power to prevent a vicious tyrant from coming to be, and did nothing to stop it, what would we say about you? If you had the power to help relief supplies get through to earthquake victims, and without your help they wouldnt get through, but you did nothing, what would we say about you? So, from Humes point of view, what should we say about God?

4.what does Hick mean by soul making? And what analogy does he offer to replace Humes analogy that God is supposed to be like a master designer or builder of the universe? How does this enable Hick to try to deal with the problem of evil in a very different way than Hume did?

5.Who do you think is right about the problem of evil, Hume or Hick? Be sure to explain your answer.