Please answer the questions from the case study below based on what we discussed in Chapter 1: Case 1 (5 Marks) A major manufacturer of advanced electronic game play units agreed with an equally large international retailer on certain terms for the production and distribution of the newest such game units. It was agreed that the manufacturer would provide the retailer with the first 1 million units to the exclusion of all other retailers. The retailer would receive its units for an exclusive product launch week, before any other units would be sold wholesale to other retailers. In turn, the retailer agreed to sell the units at precisely $599.99, this price being ideal, according to the manufacturer's market research. Every purchaser. would also receive a T-shirt with the manufacturer's logo and $20 in gift coupons for the retail store. If the business relationship later fell apart, which party could enforce which parts of this agreement? Could it be attacked by others? Case 2 (5 Marks) Maria intended to open a store in a major mall. She invited Yasmin to join her through investment and management of the operation. Yasmin agreed on the condition that she could raise the money and work it into her schedule as an assistant in an accounting firm. She did raise the money, and sent it to Maria, and on the strength of that, Maria signed the shopping centre lease agreement. When Yasmin's employer discovered her plans, it informed her that "no moonlighting" was a condition of her employment contract. Discuss the implications of this for Maria and Yasmin. Case 3 (5 Marks) Megamalls Inc, is known for its ability to create "retail experiences" for customers visiting any one of its six malls in major Canadian cities, with each mall being in the 80-120 store range. To further its reputation, Megamalls specially selects its qualifying tenant stores for a very particular mix of goods and services it feels will create the greatest customer draw. Moreover, it draws up tenant contracts to ensure that retail offerings are in accordance with its wishes. Recently one chain of stores with tenancies in each of the six Megamalls began changing its own retail image by altering its line of goods and marketing tactics, Megamalls feels that this is in contravention of the tenant contract. What remedy or remedies should Megamalls seek and why