please answerthis question within 30 minutes. make sure the explanation and reasons are explained in very detailed manner , Attempt the answer only if your are 100% sure that its correct. else leave it for other tutor otherwise i will give negative ratings and will also report your answer for unprofessionalism. Make sure the answer is 100% correct and is not copied from anywhere. ATTEMPT THE QUESTION ONLY IF YOU ARE 100% CORRECT AND SURE. ELSE LEAVE IT FOR ANOTHER TUTOR. BUT PLEASE DONT PUT WRONG ANSWER ELSE I WILL REPORT.

On a separate piece of paper, please answer the following questions. Please note that I am more interested in your analysis than I am your conclusion. Specifically, I am looking for you to identify the issue, identify and discuss the rule(s) of law and then applying the facts of the case to the rule(s) of law to reach a conclusion. More weight will be given your argument supporting your conclusion than to the conclusion itself. 1.) Big Corporation, a steel manufacturer, owned and operated a manufacturing plant. Big Corporation hired Youngstown Security Patrol, Inc. (YSP), a security company, to guard Big Corporation's property and \"deter thieves and vandals.\" Some YSP security guards carried firearms. Eric Bator, a YSP security guard, was not certified as an armed guard but nevertheless took his gun in a brief case to work. While working at the Big Corporation plant, Bator fired his gun at Derrell Pusey, in the belief that Pusey was an intruder. The bullet struck and killed Pusey. Pusey's mother filed suit against Big Corporation and others, alleging in part that her son's death was the result of YSP's negligence, for which Big Corporation was responsible. What legal arguments will each side make? What is the likely outcome of this case and why