Please brief the case using the following format:

Issue:

Rule:

Analysis:

Conclusion:

"Thoughts"

GUTH et al. V. 3 LOFT, Inc. 3 Supreme Court of Delaware. April 11, 1939. 4 ...1 567891011 For convenience, Loft Incorporated, will be referred to as Loft; the Grace Company, Inc., of Delaware, as Grace; and Pepsi-Cola Company, a corporation of Delaware, as Pepsi. 12 Loft filed a bill in the Court of Chancery against Charles G. Guth, Grace and Pepsi seeking to impress a trust in favor of the complainant upon all shares of the capital stock of Pepsi registered in the name of Guth and in the name of Grace (approximately 91% of the capital stock), to secure a transfer of those shares to the complainant, and for an accounting. 13 The cause was heard at great length by the Chancellor who, on September 17, 1938, rendered a decision in favor of the complainant in accordance with the pravers of the bill. Loft, Inc. v. Guth. Del.Ch.2 A.2d 225. An interlocutorv GUTH et al. V. 3 LOFT, Inc. 3 Supreme Court of Delaware. April 11, 1939. 4 ...1 567891011 For convenience, Loft Incorporated, will be referred to as Loft; the Grace Company, Inc., of Delaware, as Grace; and Pepsi-Cola Company, a corporation of Delaware, as Pepsi. 12 Loft filed a bill in the Court of Chancery against Charles G. Guth, Grace and Pepsi seeking to impress a trust in favor of the complainant upon all shares of the capital stock of Pepsi registered in the name of Guth and in the name of Grace (approximately 91% of the capital stock), to secure a transfer of those shares to the complainant, and for an accounting. 13 The cause was heard at great length by the Chancellor who, on September 17, 1938, rendered a decision in favor of the complainant in accordance with the pravers of the bill. Loft, Inc. v. Guth. Del.Ch.2 A.2d 225. An interlocutorv