please can you answer analysis 1 and analysis 2

Instructions: Print this page, reproduce by hand or complete via computer. Regardless, you must note answers in the space provided ONLY. All supporting math (round to 2 decimal points) must be shown in the corresponding space. If you write an answer and math is not included or does not correspond, you will receive no points. Note: You must write neatly and NOT in red ink. You are not permitted to cross out answers; use white-out or start over. Further, if I cannot read your work, you will receive zero points. When completed: Take a photo of this page/save file and upload via the corresponding Assignment link in Canvas by the due date. Remember: No HEIC files are permitted. ANALYSIS 1 COST Location Demand Moderate Low High Payoff 9 40,000 80,000 140,000 Table R 20,000 100,000 180,000 120,000 90,000 60,000 Answer (2 pts): 1. Assume no probabilities are available with the data above. What is the MAXIMIN choice? State location AND $ value. Location: Answer (2 pts): 2. Assume no probabilities are available with the data above. What is the MAXIMAX choice? State location AND $value. Location: Answer (2 pts): 3. Assume no probabilities are available with the data above. What is the LAPLACE choice? State location AND $ value. Location: Answer (2 pts): 4. Assume the probability for of low demand is 30% and high demand is 20%. What is the EMV for Q? Answer (2 pts): 5. Assume the probability for of low demand is 30% and high demand is 20%. What is the EMV for R? Answer (2 pts): 6. Assume the probability for of low demand is 30% and high demand is 20%. What is the EMV for S? 7. Considering just the EMVS, which location would you recommend? Answer (1 pt): Answer: YES NO 8. Wes and Steve can hire a firm to determine what demand will be. It will cost $20,000 and results can be delivered in an acceptable timeframe. Would you recommend that they hire the firm? MUST SHOW APPROPRIATE MATH BELOW TO SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER (6 pt) Why? ANALYSIS 2 9. Wes has developed the following PROFIT decision tree to decide whether to secure 3 or 5 locations for lunch stops. Complete the tree below and select the decision to be made and corresponding EMV. Assume that the likelihood of low demand is .70 and high demand is.30; the likelihood of a very successful campaign is.70. Very Successful $400,000 Promo Successful Low D $300,000 3 Locations $200,000 High D $500,000 Very Successful $500,000 Successful $400,000 $300,000 $600,000 5 Locations Low D High D EMV 3 Locations: EMV S Locations: Decision (circle one): Nothing Promo Nothing 3 LOCATIONS (2 pts) (2 pts) 5 LOCATIONS (2 pts) Background: Wes and Steve are partners in a lunch truck company that operates a central kitchen and operates lunch. trucks that travel to various locations in Philadelphia, Monday-Friday. The lunch trucks deliver pre-packaged healthy sandwich and salad alternatives, fresh fruit and pre-packaged low-fat desserts and canned beverages. Together, the partners have to make many decisions about how to structure the operational aspects of the business so that it is cost effective, efficient and profitable. Current Situation: Analysis 1: Steve and Wes have been investigating new, larger locations for their central kitchen (they have outgrown their current space). They have identified 3 locations for final consideration and have developed a payoff table (next page) that identifies COSTS for various levels of demand (low, moderate and high). They have also estimated that the probability of low demand is 30% and high demand is 20%. Using the COST payoff table and likelihoods provided on page 2, determine the following and answer questions shown: Maximin choice Maximax choice LaPlace choice EMVS for each option Analysis 2: Wes is investigating whether to expand the company's lunch truck stops by either 3 or 5 locations. He has developed a PROFIT decision tree and supporting data as found on page 3. With the data provided, complete the decision tree analysis and indicate his preferred course of action