Please don't answer unless you are 100% sure about the answer.

An employee at a large company reported that he had received death threats, was the target of racist and homophobic messages and graffiti, his bike and car tires were punctured, and someone poured sugar into the gas tank of his car. In response, the company documented the employees complaints and began an investigation. Records were checked to determine who was on the companys premises when the incidents occurred. Handwriting samples were examined to try to identify the perpetrators. The company reminded its workers that harassment of fellow employees was not acceptable. The perpetrators were never caught, but the incidents became fewer and eventually stopped. If the employee were to sues the company for punitive damages, the actions taken by the company would most likely be deemed to be sufficient to protect the company because it acted honestly and responsibly and did not react with reckless indifference to the employees federally-protected rights. TRUE or FALSE? Why?