Please help me reply back to my classmates discussion post.

I think leaders are made. I personally don't think anyone is born a leader. It takes time and effort. Sometimes people have those natural leader qualities, but it doesn't mean they are fully made to become one. "One famous debate at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy in $2016$ took two groups from the Academic Fellows Program and had them argue over which side had the most evidence in their favor. These groups looked at several studies of twins to compare leadership traits. The findings were not as conclusive as they likely hoped $.$ The side which argued that leaders are born, not made, showed examples of twins who demonstrated impressive leadership capabilities, such as astronauts Mark and Scott Kelly. The side which favored the "leadership is learned" argument showed examples of leadership principles and traits that cannot be genetic, such as a passion for helping others, integrity, and a vision for the future. The two groups concluded that the answer likely involved some element of both nature and nurture.