Please help me with this chart regarding the Constitutional Law Mock Appeal Scenario: Benita Suarez v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration from OJEN. Please also help me with the arguments part of Section D.

 

Link to the Case: https://ojen.ca/en/resource/constitutional-law-mock-appeal-scenario-benita-suarez-v-minister-of-citizenship-and-immigration

 

Link to the Case: https://ojen.ca/wp-content/uploads/THE-CHARTER-CHALLENGE-CASE-SCENARIO-Spring-2012_0.pdf
 

Transcribed Image Text:

How to complete the Respondent's Factum GROUNDS OF APPEAL Issue/Issue One [copy it here] # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and the infringement is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. OR # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and, in the alternative, if the Appellant is mistaken in this view, the infringement is/is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Issue Two [copy it here] # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and the infringement is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. OR # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and, in the alternative, if the Appellant is mistaken in this view, the infringement is/is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Issue Three [copy it here] [copy the text from Issue Two above - and complete. Do the same for EVERY ISSUE YOU WILL ARGUE] How to complete the Respondent's Factum GROUNDS OF APPEAL Issue/Issue One [copy it here] # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and the infringement is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. OR # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and, in the alternative, if the Appellant is mistaken in this view, the infringement is/is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Issue Two [copy it here] # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and the infringement is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. OR # The Respondent takes the position that s. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not infringed by [name the rule/law at issue in your case] and, in the alternative, if the Appellant is mistaken in this view, the infringement is/is not reasonably justified in a free and democratic society by s 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Issue Three [copy it here] [copy the text from Issue Two above - and complete. Do the same for EVERY ISSUE YOU WILL ARGUE]