*********** Please help with this business law question ASAP (I WILL RATE THANK U) ***********

Please read the case Grutter v. Bollinger and share your answers to the following questions and reflection prompt by Sunday. This case is not an excerpt so give yourself time to read it. You may look for summaries online to help you, but you still must answer the questions here from the case itself. Issue: What does the Court state is the legal question(s) they must answer in this case? Rule: What rule or rules does the Court identify as applicable to this factual and legal situation? Application: How does the Court reason? How do they apply the rule or rules to the facts to help them reach a decision? Do they reference any previous cases (precedent) to support their logic? Which ones? Conclusion: How does the Court answer the Issue? Which party benefits from the Court's decision. Reflection Prompt: What do your think about the Court's decision? Do you agree with their reasoning? Please read The Myth of Meritocracy. - See the most recent case on this subject, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. (Harvard Corp.) (1st Cir. Nov. 12, 2020) - (summary). Do you agree with the First Circuit's decision? Why or why not? What do you think about the myth of meritocracy? Why is it a myth? Please read the case Grutter v. Bollinger and share your answers to the following questions and reflection prompt by Sunday. This case is not an excerpt so give yourself time to read it. You may look for summaries online to help you, but you still must answer the questions here from the case itself. Issue: What does the Court state is the legal question(s) they must answer in this case? Rule: What rule or rules does the Court identify as applicable to this factual and legal situation? Application: How does the Court reason? How do they apply the rule or rules to the facts to help them reach a decision? Do they reference any previous cases (precedent) to support their logic? Which ones? Conclusion: How does the Court answer the Issue? Which party benefits from the Court's decision. Reflection Prompt: What do your think about the Court's decision? Do you agree with their reasoning? Please read The Myth of Meritocracy. - See the most recent case on this subject, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll. (Harvard Corp.) (1st Cir. Nov. 12, 2020) - (summary). Do you agree with the First Circuit's decision? Why or why not? What do you think about the myth of meritocracy? Why is it a myth