please make sure answer is correct thanks.

An article reported on a study in which each of 13 workers was provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on energy expenditure [kcal/kg(subjecl)/|b(clay)]. Worker: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cnnuentinnal: 0.0015 0.0015 0.0010 0.0022 0.001 0.0016 0.0028 Perforated: 0.0015 0.001 0.0019 0.0013 0.0011 0.0017 0.0024 Worker: 3 D 10 11 12 13 Cnnventinllal: 0.0021 0.0015 0.0014 0.0023 0.0017 0.002 Perforated: 0.0021 0.0013 0.0013 0.0017 0.0015 0.0013 Ia USE SALT D0 these data provide convincing evidence that the mean energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated slinvel?Test the relevant hypotheses using a signicance level of0.05 (Use son to calculate the Pvalue. Lise pd : \"communal \"perforated. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) f: 1.47632 x df: .000438383 x M... x state your conclusion. (Q We fail to reject H\". We have no evidence that the mean energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel. 0 We fail to reject H\". We have convincing evidence that the mean energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel. 0 We reject H\". We have no evidence thatthe mean energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel. 0 We reject H\". We have convincing evidence that the rnean energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel