Please note : Looking for substantive input- this means that looking for you to contribute in substantive ways, legal principles and case law to answer the questions posted and the fact patternsLegal opinion but not just opinion tell much more informative

Provide a substantive response to at least one of the following questions and provide a substantive response to at least one submission of another student. See the Course Outline for details on what is expected of you in the forums. To obtain credit, posting must be done no later than September 17 at 10:00 AM. The earlier the better. 1. In the United States, each state is allowed to decide its own criminal law, resulting in fifty different penal codes. Thus the criminal law can and does vary from state to state. In Canada, only the federal Parliament can enact criminal law, resulting in one criminal law that governs everyone. Is one system better and if so, why? 2. Section 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms allows for limitations on Charter rights if those limitations are reasonable and demonstrably justified. Why is this clause part of the Charter? Should it be there? How does this apply to the COVID-19 pandemic? 3. Review Case Summary 2.12 (the Rodriguez and Carter cases). In Carter, the Supreme Court of Canada decided the opposite of what it decided twenty years earlier in Rodriguez. Is it okay for the SCC to change its mind