Please read the case and answer the questions at the end so I can make a powerpoint from it.

Questions 1: What Business decision do you believe each of the stakeholders or ethicits listed below, would make in this situation?

Question: Analyze and discuss the perspectives of each of the following stakeholders in deciding whether Mr. Johnson properly handled this matter. Discuss the position you believe each of the following would have taken when faced with the fact scenario, why, in the opposing view to that position.

Free marketers

Utilitarians

Deontologists

Virtue Ethicists

Employees (baristas, partners)

Customers

Suppliers (Supply firms, coffee farmers)

Community Members

Investors

Backeround One year after becoming CEO of Starbucks, Kevin Johnson faced a leadership test when two black men were arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks. The men were waiting to meet a business associate, but they didn't purchase anything while they were waiting. The store manager asked them to leave, and they refused, explaining that they were there to meet someone. The manager called the police because the men refused to leave, and the police arrested them Another patron at Starbucks recorded the arrest on her cell phone, and it quickly went viral. In an interview after the arrest, the woman who took the video mentions that she had been sitting there for a while, and she wasn't asked to leave even though she didn' order anything. Additionally, the video shows the business associate of the black men show up during the arrest, and he asks the manager and the police what the men had done wrong. The general public and those who witnessed the arrest labeled it as discriminatory and racist. This happened on a Thursday and the following Monday Johnson said that the manager no longer worked at the store. The arrests led to protests and sit-ins at the Philadelphia Starbucks the days following the event. In his apology statement and follow up video release shortly after the arrests, Johnson said, The video shot by customere is very hard to watch and the actions in it are not represeritative of our Starbucks Mission and Values. Crenting an erviromment that is both safe and walcoming fon evervone is saramount for cyory stose Regretfully, our practices and training led to a bad outcome - the basis for the call to the Philadelphia police department was wrong." Before the incident, Starbucks had no companywide policy about asking customers to leave, and the decision was left to the discretion of each store manager. Because of this flexible policy, Starbucks had become a community hub--a place where anyone could sit without being required to spend money. Johnson mentioned this community in his apology when he said Starbucks works to create an environment that is "both safe and welcoming for everyone." ISara Tangdall, The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership, https:/(www.scu. edwleadershipethicsiresources the-ceo-of-starbucks-and-the-practice-of-ethical-leadership/. Also in his apology, Johnson outlined the investigation he and the company would undertake. The apology detailed actionable steps Starbucks leadership would follow to learn from the situation, including meeting with community stakeholders to learn what they could have done better. Johnson took full responsibility for the actions of his employees, and he acknowledged that Starbucks customers were hurt by the arrests, Johnson acknowledged that employees needed more training, including about when to call authorities, and that the company needed to conduct a thorough analysis of the practices that lead to this incident. After issuing his apology, Johnson went to Philadelphia and met with the two men face to face to involve them in dialogue on what Starbucks needed to do differently. The week following the arrests, Starbucks announced it would temporarily close 8,000 stores to conduct unconscious bias training, which they did on May 29, 2018. A month after the arrests, Starbucks released a new "Use of Third Place Policy," which states that anyone can use Starbucks and its facilities without makinga purchase; it also explains what managers should do if a customer becomes disruptive. Additionally, the policy says that Starbucks seeks to create "a culture of warmth and betonging where everyone is welcome. This policy is intended to help maintain the third place environment in alignment With our mission to inspire and nurture the hruman spirit - one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time: " What business decision do you believe each of the stakeholders or ethicists listed below would make in this situation? Analyze and discuss the perspectives of each of the following stakeholders in deciding whether Mr. Johnson properly handled this matter. You should discuss the position you believe each of the following would have taken when faced with the fact scenario, why, and the opposing view to that position, should be included in your PowerPoint presentation: - Free marketers - Utilitarians - Deontologists - Virtue ethicists - Employees (baristas, partners) - Customers - Suppliers (supply firms, coffee farmers) - Community Members - Investors