Please read the case study and answer the following questions. need unique answers please.

Case Study 1-Going to the dogs tet's admit it: Wich very few eaceptions, we all love dogs. We love to be with our dogs, and our dogs love to be with us. So it is only natural, then, to want to beep cur dogs with us as much as possible, even when we go to wark. Pet sitters international thinks this is sach a good ided that they have instituted "Take Your Dog ta Work Dav," a ente-s-year ewent designed to raise awareness of the benefits of dog awnership and to encturage pet adeption. But mayhe you wauld ike somethirg a blt more regular, like hering the optien to bring fido to work every day? According to a 2006 survery by the American Pet Preducts Manufacturers Awociation, it should not be too hard to find an oppertunity since nearly ane in five companies already allows pets in the workplace. You can even find a lat of emplopers that allow canines at wark on DogFriendly, oom. Fans of the dogs-at-the-offioe polcy say it increases em- ployee morale and decreases stress. Before we go too far with this idea, however, per-haps we should take nete of some arguments against bringing dogs to wark. First, some HR experts lise Ethan winning have cautioned that dogs can be mexy. lacing an unfair burden an emplevers to clean up afterwards. Dogs can also be a distracticas, and other employees marp be alkergic or otherwise dibturbed by them. And what happens when two or more employees bring their dogs to werk on the same day, and Fibo and fili den't want to play nice? Of coursen, some poople actually need to bring thwir dogs to work, which is why the Americans whth Dispbilities Aet pemits the use of "service arimals" to asuist those with disobilisiss, for example, seeingeye dogs are albwed to accampony blind indhidabs at work. The UEOC Ruidelne is reasenebie since auide dogs atp necessary to blind ind viduak, and turthermure, guide dogs are thined not to be a mulsante. It can be chwlenging however, for empioyers lo know where to drinw the lne Take the case of Eilzabeth Booth, a cuadriplegic hired by Case Straices Corporation as an acocuntant in the biling department Beoth, who sses a wheeichair fer mobility, has trahed her small, well-behaved dog to pick ep small items that looth has dropped. Alang with a fnrmal request to be albwed to bring her dog to woek to asdist her, Booth submitted to her miplever a lecter from her doctor stating that the dog would also help relieve Boath's strias. When Case Seruices's tat drcutor denied the request, Hosth immedistely filed a discrimination cherge with the CEOC, climi-g the company did not provide a reasanabie accemmodetion to her disabiity or her kealth neees. When it comes ta establahing a pet pollicy, ia bs so often she case, belanding the emploper's needs and responslilitics with the emploves' needs end wants presents semething of a dilemma. Duesticns 1. What is your positien en this issue? Provile two or tirwe ressors to support your afgument. 2. If you were an H manaper of a compary, what pet policy wnuld you sut and how wuuld you implement it? 3. How would you decide the cave of Elicabeth Beath, and which tows would pou base your decibian on? Explain