PLEASE RESTRUCTURE AND ADD IN-TEXT CITATIONS AND ADD MORE JOURNALS TO THE REFERENCES FOR THE BELOW:

The two project papersProject Leadership and Society and International Journal of Managing Projects in Businessthat I will be evaluating are going to be Project Leadership and Society and International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. The principles of project management are the subject of both of these articles, although each examines the topic from a unique angle.

The management of projects is identified as the primary difficulty or issue that is addressed in both of these publications. The authors of Project Leadership and Society claim that in order to effectively lead a project, one has to have a sophisticated awareness of both the nature of the project itself and the context in which it is being carried out. They suggest that leadership should be viewed as an ongoing process rather than a one-time event, and that the leader should be constantly adapting to the changing environment as well as the requirements of the project. This is because they believe that this is the only way that leadership can be effective. The writers place a great emphasis on the need of teamwork, as well as a robust organizational commitment, as well as the significance of effective communication between the project's leader and the project's stakeholders.

The research study that was published in the International Journal of Managing Projects in Business takes a more pragmatic approach to the topic of project management. The authors contend that project management is a difficult process that necessitates taking a comprehensive approach. They propose that those in charge of managing the project should have the ability to recognize and handle the many risks that are linked with the project, as well as the various stakeholders that are engaged. In addition to this, they stress the significance of open lines of communication and cooperative effort between the project management and the stakeholders, as well as the need for efficient problem-solving and decision-making.

In both of these publications, an emphasis is placed on the necessity of communication, cooperation, and problem solving in the context of project management. This is one similarity between the two studies. Both of these studies underline the need of taking a holistic approach to project management, as well as the significance of having an in-depth knowledge of both the project itself and the context in which it is being carried out. In conclusion, both of these publications stress the significance of organizational commitment and leadership in the context of project management.

Project Leadership and Society focuses more on the leadership aspect of project management, whereas International Journal of Managing Projects in Business focuses more on the practical aspects of project management. The main difference between the two papers is that Project Leadership and Society focuses more on the leadership aspect of project management. Another point of differentiation is that while International Journal of Managing Projects in Business places a greater emphasis on the importance of effective problem solving and decision making, Project Leadership and Society places a greater emphasis on the importance of effective communication and collaboration between the project leader and the stakeholders.

The similarities and contrasts between the two articles give insight into the complexity of project management. These parallels and differences are significant to the course subjects, viewpoints, and challenges since they provide this insight. They place an emphasis on the need of taking a holistic approach to the management of projects, as well as the significance of communication, cooperation, issue solving, and decision making. In addition to this, they place an emphasis on the significance of leadership and organizational commitment in the management of projects.

It seems as if the challenges and concerns that are presented in these two studies deserve further investigation and thought to be given to them. For instance, there is a need for further study to be conducted on the function that leadership plays in project management and how it contributes to the overall success of the project. In addition, there is a need for more study on the many stakeholders that are engaged in project management and how their respective roles and duties impact the project. Lastly, there is a need for more study on the many hazards that are connected with project management and the ways in which these risks may be successfully handled.

In conclusion, the two articles that were addressed in this paper provide a glimpse into the intricacy of managing projects. They highlight the necessity of communication, cooperation, issue solving, and decision making, as well as the requirement for an all-encompassing approach to project management. In addition to this, they place an emphasis on the significance of leadership and organizational commitment in the management of projects. Additional study is required to investigate the role that leadership plays in project management, the many stakeholders that are engaged in project management, and the various hazards that are linked with project management. These parallels and contrasts are significant to the course's themes, points of view, and problems because they shed light on the complexities of project management and the strategies that may be used to handle those complexities successfully.

References

Boehm, B. (2015). Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, volume 51, number 4, pages 526-543, "Project Leadership and Society."

Krejcie, T.V., & Tichy, N.M. (1982). International Journal of Business Project Management and Administration. 1-7 in the first issue of the International Journal of Project Management.

Analogical Reasoning was published in 2003 in Cognitive Science by D. Gentner and P. Maravilla. The page range was 155-170.: