Please see Celine's email below:

Please write an email that meets the following requirement:

Overview The information that follows is highly confidential. If you believe you have been erroneously provided this information, please inform Ms. Celine Devray directly. Bolt Plastics Inc. is a medium-sized manufacturing firm based out of Walla Walla, Washington. The firm specializes in the design and production of plastic molds for a variety of industries including the food packaging, pharmaceuticals, and plastic tooling industries. Currently 430 people are employed over six production lines. Over the past year and a half, executive management of Bolt Plastics have been in discussion with Nigik Robotics Ltd. to automate one of the six Bolt Plastics lines (Line 6- Small Materials). Business Case If Bolt Plastics wishes to retain its foothold in the state of Washington, and more broadly, the North American market, it must strive to remain competitive with other state-level competitors such as Enghert Molding and Gerhardt Molds Ltd. Both of these companies have undergone automation processes in the past ten years, leaving Bolt Plastics at a comparative disadvantage. Payroll and HR Impact . Key Topics: Reduction of 65 full-time jobs from Line 6 representing 15% of the current workforce 43 employees have been flagged to be laid off. These jobs will not be replaced. 22 employees have been flagged for potential reskilling to different job functions. Training for new roles will take place over 6-8 months. Union policy requires employees that are laid off to receive severance payments, including a year's salary and retention of extended health benefits under the Bolt Plastics Family & Friends plan for up to 20 months. An opt-in job transition program will be offered by the Bolt Plastics Human Resource department to further assist these individuals. O Automation Impact Key Topics: Full technical servicing of the line will be provided by Nigik Robotics. Cost for servicing billed annually. Production efficiency increased by an anticipated 78%, leading to a potential revenue increase of 26% in the first full fiscal year following the transition. By now you've hopefully heard back from Celine and if not, I'd wait for her response before proceeding. Based on what she's said of the situation, you'll need to perform a critical analysis of the summary. As you work through this process, consider which areas Celine seemed most keen on. You will ultimately need to select two or three key topics for Celine to focus on during her presentation to the board. Knowing her, it's highly likely that she will have questions based on what you've submitted. If you experience pushback on your initial suggestion, I would advise you to revisit your own argumentation to see if it holds up in light of the criticism. If it does, don't be afraid to stand by it, restating its merits, or perhaps providing additional information to defend it. NOTE: You'll need to submit your suggestions to her with the text of the proposal in the message itself, do not send it as an attachment. - Hendrai