Please write a brief (no more than one page) IRAC developing a legal court solution to the scenario shown below. Follow the sub-headings listed here. Standard grading rubric rules will apply here. This means that spelling, punctuation, and grammar are important! This also means that anything "borrowed' from an outside resource MUST be cited. (Reference Page can leak onto a second page)

Issue(s) - are written in the form of questions! These issues are questions one might ask regarding how the law applies to the article you have chosen.

Rules - are the laws/rules that the writer thinks may apply to the issues.

Analysis - is where the writer either proves or disproves the application of the rules. This is a major focus of the paper and presentation.critical thinking must be applied.

Conclusion - You are judge and jury! What is your decision regarding this case? You can research the court decision, but the preference is that you decide using your own critical thinking skills. This conclusion is not a matter of being right or wrong, but a matter of how well you support your argument.

This Week's Topic

Thomas Rinks and Joseph Shields developed Psycho Chihuahua, a caricature of a Chihuahua dog with a do-not-back-down attitude. They promoted and marketed the character through their company, Wrench, LLC. Ed Alfaro and Rudy Pollak, representatives of Taco Bell Corp., learned of Psycho Chihuahua and met with Rinks and Shields to talk about using the character as a Taco Bell icon. Wrench sent artwork, merchandise, and marketing ideas to Alfaro, who promoted the character within Taco Bell. Alfaro asked Wrench to propose terms for Taco Bell's use of Psycho Chihuahua. Taco Bell did not accept Wrench's terms, but Alfaro continued to promote the character within the company. Meanwhile, Taco Bell hired a new advertising agency, which proposed an advertising campaign involving a Chihuahua. When Alfaro learned of this proposal, he sent the Psycho Chihuahua materials to the agency. Taco Bell made a Chihuahua the focus of its marketing but paid nothing to Wrench. Wrench filed a suit against Taco Bell in a federal court claiming that it had an implied contract with Taco Bell and that Taco Bell breached that contract.