Please write a well rounded paragraph to help me better understand this question. (this is the second time im asking this question because or incorrect answer. The man who is in question for the promotion is not related to the person deciding who gets the promotion. It is just saying that he is the breadwinner of HIS family compared to the single women with no children) thank you in advance and I will thumbs up the answer if it is correct.

In determining to whom to award a promotion, an employer was torn between awarding it to a single female employee who had no children and a male employee, who was the sole breadwinner with a family. Both employees were equally qualified for the promotion. The employer decided to award the male employee the promotion, reasoning that the male employee, because of his family responsibilities, most needed the extra money that the promotion would afford. The employer then admitted to thetfemale employee that he gave it to the male employee because the male employee was a family man and needed the money. If the female employee sues for gender discrimination, what type of evidence will she offer to prove discrimination? Will she win? Have you ever heard anyone in the workplace voice sentiments like this? Do you believe there is merit to the employer's reasoning? Discuss