Pleased $/$fl$$t eased by something that has occured, you are happy about it because it makes you feel significant. I am pleased that they should be as encouraging

flattering $/\text{'}$fl$$t$$r$$r$/.1$ ADJ If something is flattering, it makes you seem more good$-$looking. His hair has been cut in a shorter, more flattering style. $2$ ADJ If someone'scommentsor conduct are flattering, they are nice because they prove that the individual has a highiudgementof you. It is forever flattering to be asked to decide

flaunt $/$flo:nt$/$ flaunts, flaunting, flaunted. VERB If I say that someone flaunts their possessions or qualities, $!$ mean that they show them in a very clear way in$.$ He drove around in Bentleys $,$ openly flaunting his affluence

flavour $($AM flavor$)/\text{'}$flerve$/$ flavours, flavouring, flavoured. $1N-$vAR The flavour of a food or drink is its taste. This cheese has a crumbly texture with a strong flavour. $-$flavoured $...$fruitflavored sparkling water. $2$ veRB If you flavour food or drink, you add something to give it a particular taste. Flavour your favourite dishes with exotic herbs and spices. $3N-u$ The flavour of something is its distinctive characteristic or quality. Claude's landscapes have a strong Italian flavour.

$($a$)$ Describe how the data is masked, and comment on whether all instances seem necessary given the limitations of what can be $($typically$)$ be claimed as being under copyright.

$($b$)$ Looking specifically at the parts of the dictionary that are eligible for copyright, discuss whether this procedure could be considered copyright infringement or plagiarism $($and if so$,$ which type$).$

$($c$)$ Such a transformation of the original text could be done manually or automatically. A person could read through the text and modify the text, relying on their knowledge and additional resources. A more efficient option would be to build an automated system, which would modify the text without human interference based on a pre$-$created set of data and an algorithm. Discuss the different implications these two approaches might bring to issues of plagiarism and copyright.