Question: Problem Set LN 4 Question 1 . Which of the following should be treated as incremental cash flows when deciding whether to invest in a

Problem Set LN 4 Question 1.Which of the following should be treated as incremental cash flows when deciding whether to invest in a new manufacturing plant? The site is already owned by the company but existing buildings would need to be demolished.a) The market value of the site and existing buildings.b) Demolitions costs and site clearance.c) The cost of a new access road put in last year.d) Lost earnings on other products due to executive time spent on the new facility. e) A proportion of the cost of leasing the presidents jet airplane.f) Future depreciation of the new plant.g) The reduction in the firms tax bill resulting from tax depreciation of the new plant. h) The initial investment in inventories of raw materials.i) Money already spent on the engineering design of the new plant.Question 2.United Pigpen is considering a proposal to manufacture high-protein hog feed. The project would make use of an existing warehouse which is currently rented out to a neighboring firm. This years rental charge on the warehouse is $100,000 and this number is expected to grow at 4% per year. In addition to using the warehouse the proposal envisages an investment in plant and equipment of $1.2 million. Depreciation is $120,000 per year. Pigpen expects to terminate the project after eight years and to resell the plant and equipment then (i.e., in t=8) for $400,000. The project requires an initial (t=0) investment in working capital of $350,000. Thereafter, working capital is forecasted to be 10% of sales in each of years 1 through 7.This years sales of hog feed are expected to be $4.2 million and thereafter sales are forecasted to grow by 5% per year. Manufacturing costs are expected to be 90% of sales. The corporate tax rate is 35% and the cost of capital is 12%.What is the NPV of Pigpens project?Hint: Ask yourself if the sale of the plant and equipment in t=8 is taxable.Question 3USX is considering adding an additional furnace that will operate for ten years. Last year the company commissioned a feasibility study that cost $1 million. The study came up with the following numbers. The new furnace costs $1,000 million and has a salvage value of $200 million at the end of the ten-year period. Using the new furnace increases sales by $150 million per year and involves operating expenses of $10 million per year. Moreover, working capital requirements increase by $20 million immediately. According to IRS rules the new furnace must be depreciated straight line over eight years. The new furnace will need parts from an old furnace USX already owns. The old furnace is fully depreciated and has a resale value (after-tax) of $30 million. Without the parts, which are no longer manufactured, the old furnace has no resale value. The corporate tax rate is 35% and the cost of capital is 10%. Should USX go ahead with the new furnace?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Finance Questions!