Question: Prove that the first welfare theorem doesn't hold when agent A solves: max x_{1A} + x_{2A} s.t p x_{1A} + x_{2A} le 2p + 1,
Prove that the first welfare theorem doesn't hold when agent A solves: \max x_{1A} + x_{2A} s.t p x_{1A} + x_{2A} \le 2p + 1, agent B solves \max p (1 + \epsilon)x_{1B} + x_{2B} s.t p x_{1B} + x_{2B} \le p + 2. The goods are indivisibles goods
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
