Provide a peer response to your classmate, Tonie's post below

"Hello class,

Inter-organizational Context Principal-agent Problems

In inter-organizational contexts, the principal-agent problem results when the principal organization appoints tasks or responsibilities to another organizations agent, and their goals or interests are not completely unified. This can lead to the agent giving precedence to individual pursuits, possibly at the loss of the principal's goals, due to information irregularity, inconsistent incentives, or lack of supervision. The principal-agent problem designates a position where a principal delegates power or duties to an agent, but the agent's interests might not completely line up with the principal's, leading to impending conflicts and disorganization. In an inter-organizational context, this problem is intensified as the principal and agent are separate organizations, each with their particular goals, structures, and possibility for opposing interests.

While "permanent organizations typically have a stable structure allowing for ongoing adjustments to the principal-agent dynamics based on performance, trust development between parties, and changes in strategic goals" (Musawir, 2025 p 3). Some examples of just how the principal-agent problem can reveal in inter-organizational relationships. For instance, one organization might prioritize short-term profit maximization, while another focuses on long-term relationship building or innovation. Or organizations can have different risk appetites. A principal might prefer lower-risk strategies to protect the investment, while an agent might favor riskier ventures for potentially higher rewards.

Strategies for Improving Public Organizations

Several theories have expressively advanced our understanding of the principal-agent problem in an inter-organizational context, with agency theory being extremely noticeable. This theory emphasizes on the conflict of interest that arises when the agent makes decisions for the principal, especially when information is uneven and monitoring is costly. Other relevant theories include stewardship theory, which proposals an alternative viewpoint by suggesting that managers may be basically motivated to perform in the best interests of the organization, and transaction cost economics, which analyzes the costs related with using different governance structures to mitigate the agency problem.

Agency Theory

This theory highlights the challenges arising from information asymmetry and conflicting interests between principals and agents. It suggests that principals can reduce the costs connected to monitoring and cementing the agent's behavior by implementing systems like performance-based compensation, contracts, and monitoring systems. "The theory was designed to answer a question yet unresolved by bureaucratic methods of regulating employee behavior" (Gagn & Hewett 2025 p 3).

Stewardship Theory

In contrast to agency theory, stewardship theory suggests that managers are inspired by essential components and a desire to perform in the best interests of the organization. This theory suggests that resilient organizational cultures and employee confidence-building can lead to better association between principal and agent interests, decreasing the need for widespread monitoring and control. "Finally, servant leaders eschew control and advancement of their self-interest in favor of stewardship and achievement of collective aims, in part by setting examples of how to act in the common interest" (Rainey, 2021 p 360).

Transaction Cost Economics

This theory suggests that the selection of governance structure for example, market transactions, vertical integration, or strategic agreements should be established on diminishing transaction costs, including the costs of monitoring and enforcing agreements in principal-agent relationships. Because "governmental contracting involves more political criteria and accountability, and different or nonexistent profit motives, to the point that Williamson (1981) expressed uncertainty as to whether transaction-cost economics applies to nonmarket organizations" (Rainey, 2021 p 85).

Game Theory

Game theory can be used to model the strategic interactions between principals and agents, helping to understand how different choices and strategies can affect outcomes in principal-agent relationships. Therefore, game theory can be used to analyze the effectiveness of different incentive schemes or the potential for opportunistic behavior. "For example, setting prices against a rival firm's prices, deciding whether to enter a new market, recruiting and incentivizing workers, or negotiating strategic partnershipsthey should use game theory" (Huang & Golman 2025 p 2).

Social Psychology

Integrating perceptions from social psychology, like identity theory, could help clarify how factors like social signals and individual identities influence agent behavior in principal-agent relationships. This approach suggests that understanding the social context and individual motivations of agents could provide valuable awareness into modifying the principal-agent problem. "However, organizational analysts consider them pathbreaking illustrations of the influence of social and psychological factors on work behavior" (Rainey, 2021 p 23). By drawing on these diverse theoretical perspectives, researchers and practitioners can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the principal-agent problem and develop more effective strategies for managing these relationships in various organizational contexts.

Political Control Of Bureaucracy Literature

In a traditional, categorized government structure, interest group influence often contains petitioning and campaign contributions to employ pressure on individual decision-makers and civil service agencies.In collective networks, influence provides building relationships, sharing information, and co-creating resolutions with various shareholders, including government employees. Since power is concentrated in specific roles within government for example, elected officials and agency heads. Therefore, "it is not surprising that the bureaucracy is well-studied, with research spanning both the fields of political science and public administrationamong others" (Bolton & Thrower., 2023 p 1)

As well as interest groups come together on directly influencing individuals who hold decision-making power.Employing paid professionals to meet with and persuade government officials, providing financial support to candidates who support their interests, centering on specific policies or regulations that directly affect their members. In addition to the close relationships and power dynamics could produce situations where interest groups exercise undue influence or commandeer agencies, prioritizing their interests over the public good.

Provide in-text citations and references in an APA format.

Write it like it was written by me. Share a first-person view.

References:

Bolton, A., Thrower, S., (2023) Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy. Congress & the Presidency, https://research.ebsco.com/c/todldt/viewer/pdf/mnnt2vsmivLinks to an external site.

Gagn, M., Hewett, R., (2025) Assumptions about Human Motivation have Consequences for Practice. Journal of Management Studies (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) https://research.ebsco.com/c/todldt/viewer/pdf/2z3z7xjufjLinks to an external site.

Huang, S., Golman, R., (2025) The collective wisdom of behavioral game theory: The collective wisdom of behavioral game theory. Economic Theory, https://research.ebsco.com/c/todldt/viewer/pdf/hkryoood6rLinks to an external site.

Musawir, A. U., (2025) Revisiting the Principal-Agent Framework in the Context of Projects: Drawing Parallels with Corporate Governance. Project Management Journal https://research.ebsco.com/c/todldt/viewer/pdf/cdfzb6q7w5Links to an external site.

Rainey, H. G., Fernandez, S., Malatesta, D. (2021) Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, 6th Ed.