1. Provide your thoughtful position based on your personal experiences working in teams: Do you agree or disagree with the researchers findings on the characteristics of smart teams? Why or why not? Provide a minimum of two scholarly references to support your position.
2. Make one connection between your study in the Faith and Learning section of the Week 6 (or previous) Workshop to other themes in this discussion forum.
3. 

1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. 2. Read and review Case Incident 2 (Smart Teams and Dumb Teams) at the end of Chapter 10 of the Robbins and Judge textbook. 3. Navigate to the threaded discussion and write an initial posting of up to 300 words addressing the following: a. Provide your thoughtful position based on your personal experiences working in teams: Do you agree or disagree with the researchers' findings on the characteristics of smart teams? Why or why not? Provide a minimum of two scholarly references to support your position. b. Make one connection between your study in the Faith and Learning section of the Week 6 (or previous) Workshop to other themes in this discussion forum. 4. Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop. 5. Read and respond to at least two of your classmates' postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop. Limit your responses to no more than 200 words. 6. Use two additional scholarly sources beyond the required reading for this course, and list references you used to inform your postings per APA requirements (list is not included in word count). 7. Postings must occur over three different days of the workshop week