Pty ... W .. - Saved to my Mac Search (Cmd + Ctrl + U) Home Insert Draw Design Layout References Mailings > > Comments Editing v Share Calibri v 11 A A Aav AD Paste BIUvab X X ADAv Paragraph Styles Dictate Sensitivity Editor Confe 2 PR PROMPT - CONFERENCE PAPER 2 For your second essay assignment, you'll also write a conference paper. The essay portion of this assignment fulfills the writing requirements of this class. REQUIREMENTS Paper Length: 4 to 5 pages (must be at the bottom of the 4th page at least) Formatting: MLA-style, double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman. Citations: Standard works-cited/reference page and in-text citations for MLA style. Sources: at least 6 credible sources, 4 of which must be academic/peer-reviewed sources (i.e. journal articles or university press books) [NOTE: you can have more than 6 sources, and, after you've included the minimum number of academic sources, you can use other credible sources] Submission Deadlines: Each of the assignments (except the peer workshop draft) must be turned in as a PDF on Moodle by 11:59 p.m. on their respective dates: Final Draft Due Date: April 30 ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS For a conference papers, like most research papers, you'll locate sources that help you support an original argument and idea. You'll create your argument using the topic that you have already chosen for your annotated bibliography 2. Page 1 of 1 180 words [ English (United States Focus E + 138%Y ] v Annotated Bibliograp... Q @ M L~ a Q View Ragni gnt Inspector Zoom Share Highlight Rotate Markup Search Annotated Bibli... = Advancing Toward Equitable Healthcare: What the United States of America ; Can Learn from Canada The differences between the U.S. and Canadian healthcare systems indicate how the U.S. systems need to be improved. Regardless of someone's demographics, Canada has publicly funded universal healthcare, which is very diverse and offers very fair access the all the needed medical treatments of all Canadians. However, the American healthcare systems maintain gaps accruing to age, work status, and marital status, which leaves a lot of United States citizens without access to healthcare. It very well explains in the comparative study of several academic viewpointsLaPierre, Spithoven, Dillabough, Guyatt, and Santhanam, among othersthat the United States can learn a lot from Canada's healthcare system about how to improve its healthcare system. Many Americans lack healthcare insurance due to the United system based on demographics. This highlights the urgent need to make changes towards a more inclusive 3 healthcare system such as Canada's publicly funded, universal healthcare system. LaPierre, Tracey A. \"Comparing the Canadian and US systems of health care in an era of health care reform.\" Journal of health care finance vol. 38,4 (2012): 1-18. Williams 2 This article compares the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada, and there are significant differences in the coverage and accessibility of healthcare for the nationals of the two nations. LaPierre (2012) says "Nearly one-third of Canadians are covered under a publicly funded system." This ensures access to fundamental universal services, independent of Canadian @ university federal policies, and is linked to the Canada Health Act. This text also emphasizes SN Ak TR s 2202020 a0 B asn _. 4 &' Edit Video Window Help Williams 2 This article compares the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada, and there are significant differences in the coverage and accessibility of healthcare for the nationals of the two nations. LaPierre (2012) says "Nearly one-third of Canadians are covered under a publicly funded system." This ensures access to fundamental universal services, independent of Canadian university federal policies, and is linked to the Canada Health Act. This text also emphasizes how employment status, marital status, and even gender are major determinants of access to healthcare in the United States. This frequently leaves those who do not fit into specific categories without coverage. LaPierre (2012) explains" According to the article, approximately 48 percent of those with employer-based insurance in 2010 were covered as dependents, including nearly 100 percent of those younger than 18, 32.7 percent of adults aged 18 to 64, and 24.6 percent of adults aged 65 and older." This citation highlights the fact that the United States healthcare insurance system is dependent on certain attributions. Canada's health systems prioritize providing uniform coverage regardless of a person's characteristics or place of residence. it keeps people from going without medical treatment. LaPierre (2012) states "While the U.S. healthcare insurance system relies heavily on specific attributions such as employment status and age brackets for coverage, Canada's healthcare systems prioritize providing uniform coverage regardless of a person's characteristics or place of residence. This universal approach ensures that individuals in Canada do not go without necessary medical treatment, promoting equitable access to healthcare services for all citizens.\" Lastly, the article explains how Canada's healthcare system places high importance on offering universal coverage for the citizens, no matter the individual's qualities or area of residence, guaranteeing that Canadians do not encounter obstacles in receiving medical treatment through health insurance reasons. The United States' healthcare insurance system is graceless and sometimes discriminatory, not offering the Edit Video Window Help Williams 3 DOCX same courtesy which is shown significantly with this emphasis on the lack of universality. Bl (I oy Showing the differences in healthcare accessibility between the two countries. HRChueeex This author explores different ways that U.S. and Canadian healthcare is different and some of the ways that the U.S. healthcare system works aren't very fair. However, I believe that everyone should have access to quality health care, regardless of their marital status or age under 21. Those qualities shouldn't matter what should matter is that we're human and are bound to get sick so we should be able to have the correct healthcare no matter what when that time comes. Canada Gives that option to the citizens they have a very inclusive program for health so marital status and income careers aren't considered in any of the decisions on health care because they have a program. LaPierre (2012) States \"a set of publicly financed, provincially run insurance plans that typically adhere to five federal guidelines laid out in the Canada Health Act: 1. Public administration; 2. Comprehensiveness; 3. Universality;4. Portability; and 5. Access.\" This shows that the Program has inset so that health offers a very inclusive for the citizens including Universality, which I feel personally is something that the U.S. should use for health for its citizens. Spithoven, A H G M. "Why U.S. health care expenditure and ranking on health care indicators are so different from Canada's.\" International journal of health care finance and economics vol. 9,1 (2009): 1-24. doi:10.1007/s10754-008-9044-0 This, article highlights the supply side and factors of health care funds, pointing out that Canada and the US invest differently in technologies and have different drug costs. Spithoven Edit Video Window Help Williams 4 DOCX (2008) states "Health care expenditure in the U.S. is higher than in Canada, among other things, e lal el because the U.S. invests 0.07% points of GDP more in health care business assets than Canada in L0V LA T 2002." This information explains the high value of capital development in the United States healthcare business, which is much more developed compared to Canada. Secondly, the article goes in-depth into Spithoven (2008) explains \"U.S. drug prices were comparable to those in Canada in 1992 but rose relatively fast in the 1992-2002 period.\" Because there are no price controls in place, the difference in drug prices leads to higher spending on healthcare in the United States. As shown with the Baumol's cost disease, which explains systems like healthcare shows that it can be hard to increase the connectivity to industries with better rates for citizens. The U.S. healthcare challenge is still going on despite major spending on new and better medicine and technology in healthcare. This article explains how price, productivity, and investment shape differences in healthcare spending between the two countries. I enjoyed the author's explanation of Canada and the U.S. supply and spending side of healthcare in both countries. The author does reason that the spending in both countries has its good effects and bad effects, but I feel that you should take care of your citizens in your country before spending money on new medicine and technology. The U.S spends money on new medicine and technology and most of your citizens can afford the new medicine or have the healthcare insurance to cover the medicine that they are spending money to correct. I genuinely like the approach that Canada takes, the medicine is not fancy and is new, but they make sure that all Canadians can afford it and get the medicine that is needed for their health. Newer technology helps the health of humans but spending on new medicine and treatments as much as the U.S doesn't give many people the opportunity for a chance to be able to afford the medicine. Edit Video Window Help Williams 5 Due to the lack of resources and I feel that American should spend a little less money on new DOCX treatments and more money on a new inclusive system. Bl LA\\ AT Guyatt, Gordon Henry et al. \"A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States.\" Open Medicine 1 (2007): 27 - 3 This article is organized and explains well the saturated healthcare system in Canada and explains the healthcare system in the United States as well. The articles state that the United States healthcare system is very dependent on Guyatt's (2007) states "blend of public and private insurance.\" This shows the lack of diversity for everyone being able to be treated and leaving a good bit of the population without the health care that is needed by the citizens. The text argues that Canada has implemented Guyyatt's says (2007) "universal, publicly funded healthcare system." This is very inclusive for the citizens and has shown to be very effective. The article highlights patient population, and outcomes measure with an emphasis on the mortality outcomes using certain technology. Both studies on this height produced different outcomes when it came to both different countries. Results showed that the United States showed little to no difference in patient population and outcome measures they showed high in more complex charts of health care such as medicine and technology. Rather than showing high changes in positive ways due to the inclusion healthcare system they provide in patient population decreases in mortality rate. However, showed less increase in newer medicines and high technology in healthcare. This article goes into detail on the overall healthcare and diversity and inclusiveness in both countries and goes into detail about the technology increase and increase in medicines. Edit Video Window Help This articles show and reason for how the decrease in newer treatments in Canada, but they DOCX have an all-inclusive health care system that the government funds for everyone. Canada's Pl A oy PRUMPIEQOCK decrease in newer treatments does not reflect its mortality rate, although it increases in treatment and newer medicine there is still a decrease in the mortality rate in the country. It is that is not the same for the U.S. I feel like due to the lack of an inclusive healthcare system we have a very high mortality rate in the country and as the new treatment and high-scale medical technology are increasing major it still isn't helping bring the mortality rate up alongside it. I feel that if we had a more inclusive health system and thought of all citizens help that combined with the new scale treatments and technology, we would have a nonexistent mortality rate in the U.S. Guytatts (2007) states \"universal, publicly funded healthcare system.\" This quote demonstrates what the Canadian healthcare system looks like, and it would be unimaginable for the US to adopt such a system. Dillabough, E S. \"An ethical approach to health care reform in Canada: a comparison of the Canadian and American health care systems.\" Health law in Canadavol. 18,3 (2002): 75-95. This article Highlights the divide and differences between the good foundation of the healthcare systems in the countries. Also, the article discusses the political and economic concepts and discusses and deals with Healthcare reform. The article states E.S(2002) \"While healthcare is perhaps imbued with more ethical principles than any other professional activity, ethics as an analytical approach is rarely used in healthcare reform." This statement summarized Williams 7 File Edit View Go Tools Window Help v Annotated Bibliograp... @ Q @ M 7 i Q Page 7 of 10 View = Inspector Zoom Share Highlight Rotate Markup C Search Williams 7 DOCX . iz figiec e el the tendency in healthcare Reform speak, and often shows a more priority on power and the AL AT (fe) relationship with the law and government and the cost /benefit with the ethical issues. The article also goes into depth that E.S. (2002) "initiatives that appear too narrow to have a real impact are scrutinized in great detail," explaining the reputation of prioritizing certain political and economic problems above general moral issues. The behavioral foundations of healthcare in the United States and Canada are more compared with finding that the healthcare medical costs in both Canada and the United States are high in price, and the moral beliefs are usually different. E.S(2002) says \"The American approach, to a large extent, has been driven by libertarian conceptions of distributive justice; Canada's approach rests largely on egalitarian principles." The article states precisely to show the differences. This compares the foundation for more investment in the moral effects of healthcare and programs in both Canada and Untied States. This article gives good insight from a different perspective of both Canada and the U.S. healthcare. It reasons the U.S. chooses the healthcare system that it chooses due to the reasoning that the citizens of the country should choose what they want to do with their money when it comes to health. Stating that citizens with more money can get and buy better healthcare for themselves but others with little to no income struggle and typically have no healthcare. I feel that isn't fair because healthcare honestly shouldn't be something that citizens are without in their own countries everyone should be included no matter the income or the amount of money that they have for healthcare. That is the way that Canada systems work it is very inclusive of everyone no matter what income you have or what medical attention you need it will be paid for by the government. This article goes into comparing both country's healthcare system, but I believe including everyone is the best choice because it is not fair to neglect someone's healthcare due to their lack of income. File Edit View Go Tools Window Help v Annotated Bibliograp... @ Q @ M 2 |~ o Q Page 8 of 10 View g Inspector Zoom Share Highlight Rotate Markup Search Williams 8 Santhanam, Laura. "How Canada Got Universal Health Care and What the U.S. Could Learn." PBS NewsHour, Public Broadcasting Service, 22 Mar. 2022, ; www.pbs.orgewshour/health/how-canada-got-universal-health-care-and-what-the-u-s-could- learn. This PBS news article goes into detail on how the United States can learn something from the healthcare that is in Canada. This article gives insight into how the Canadian health system has developed over time and hasn't always been what we know it to be today. It wasn't until the Canada Health act 1984. This health act included full coverage of medical healthcare and treatments, which is all funded by the government and this healthcare system provided all the necessary treatment and medicine that the Canadians will need. However, even though this health care system is very inclusive does not mean that don't face problems. This article gives insight into the issues that Canada faces including long wait periods for certain treatments and a lack of medical workers. Laura (2022) states \"The U.S. could learn from Canada's experience by considering the benefits of a single-payer system." The article argues that The U.S. should learn from the Canadian health system and that the United States should investigate into lower administrative costs and. better access to healthcare. The article still does recognize the troubles that could happen if the United States would just apply this system so quickly into American society. Explain that it would have trouble not only with logical goals but also politically. The article still suggests that bringing some of the characteristics of Canadian health such, as lower cost and accessibility could be effective in the United States healthcare system. This article goes into reasoning on why the United States should take some pointers and articles from the Canadian healthcare system. The Canadian healthcare system is perfect in that although they do have issues and problems their still very inclusive of everyone no matter their File Edit View Go Tools Window Help v Annotated Bibliograp... @ Q @ M 2 |~ &l Q Page 9 of 10 View 4 Inspector Zoom Share Highlight Rotate Markup Search (i articles from the Canadian healthcare system. The Canadian healthcare system is perfect in that although they do have issues and problems their still very inclusive of everyone no matter their 2l Bhz]e CICICE EdP RUMPIEAOCX Williams 9 financial status or marital status the Canadians have an inclusive healthcare system. The article suggested that the United States should look more into lower healthcare costs and better access, which I agree with being a citizen of the United States I have seen firsthand how hard it can be to get insurance and to have access to healthcare with our coming out of pocket for it. The author also goes into detail on how challenging it would be logical and political for the healthcare system to just change in the U.S because I still think that it can be possible if the country starts small. Starting with acts like lowering some costs and making healthcare more accessible for middle-aged people and understanding what kind of healthcare system the U.S need that will be inclusive and not leaving citizen out. Some steps can be taken to better the United States healthcare system and hopefully, there are taken soon