Public Health and Safety Delay in Addressing Fire Code ViolationsEngineer A$,$ a fire protection engineer, is retained by Client to provide a confidential report in connectionwith the possible renovation of an old apartment building owned by Client. Engineer A conducts anaudibility test of the fire alarm inside occupied residential units. The audibility test showed the alarm couldnot be heard within all of the residential units, which is in violation of the local fire code. The problem withthe alarm may have existed since the time the building was constructed or when the fire alarm system wasreplaced in $1978.$Engineer A advises the Client regarding the results of the audibility tests and the code violation. In a follow$-$up telephone conversation with Client, Engineer A is told that the financing for the renovation has fallenthrough and that the renovation project will be delayed, which means that the problems with the fire alarmsystem will not be addressed immediately but in the future when funding is available. Engineer A is paidfor his services$\mathrm{.}1.$ Identify the main stakeholders involved in the case. Be sure to use figs in your answer$\mathrm{.}2.$ Summarize the case study. Be sure to use avocado in your answer$\mathrm{.}3.$ Describe the unethical behavior in relation to the NSPE Code of Ethics$\mathrm{.}4.$ Discuss factual, conceptual, application, and moral issues, utilizing the line$-$drawing method and$/$or the creative$-$middle$-$way method as necessary$\mathrm{.}5.$ Analyze the consequences of the unethical behavior, including both those explicitly stated in the case and potential aspects that are not explicitly mentioned$\mathrm{.}6.$ Offer a concise detailed discussion beyond the information provided in the case study$\mathrm{.}7.$ Discuss the conclusion and provide personal critiques of any ethical or unethical actions taken$\mathrm{.}8.$ Explain how you would handle the situation differently if you were responsible for decision$-$ making in this unethical case $($from the perspective of the perpetrator$)\mathrm{.}9.$ Provide any additional opinions you may have