Put a comment in those two post the Professor asked to comment to our classroom post,?

1I view the variety and differences in the resurrection accounts as evidence to support the resurrection. I think this because they all look at different times after the resurrection occurred from different viewpoints. This allows for more evidence of the resurrection, rather than just one person write about it which displays one viewpoint. Matthew wrote his view for the Jewish audience, which shows that Jesus was the monarch and ruled the kingdom. Mark was straightforward. Luke wrote more in detail by gathering witnesses and history. Lastly, John's version discuss Jesus' role in the creative Word of God.

2I view the variety and differences in the resurrection accounts as evidence to support the resurrection. I think this because they all look at different times after the resurrection occurred from different viewpoints. This allows for more evidence of the resurrection, rather than just one person write about it which displays one viewpoint. Matthew wrote his view for the Jewish audience, which shows that Jesus was the monarch and ruled the kingdom. Mark was straightforward. Luke wrote more in detail by gathering witnesses and history. Lastly, John's version discuss Jesus' role in the creative Word of God.