Question: Q7(4 points) Saved In Dr. Yale's experiment in the previous question the results revealed that there are no significant differences between the reference (crime scene)
Q7(4 points)
Saved
In Dr. Yale's experiment in the previous question the results revealed that there are no significant differences between the reference (crime scene) and suspect samples. In a court setting, what would this result be interpreted as? Select all that apply. (No part marks)
A
If the results demonstrate that there are no differences between the two samples, then that must mean they are similar.
B
The samples are consistent with each other.
C
The experiment suggests that the identity of the perpetrator is likely to be confirmed.
D
A statistical statement, such as a probability calculation or technique error rate is not necessary because the samples match.
E
An expert witness' job in court includes educating the Trier of Fact regarding the matching technique and its reliability.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
