Question $10(1$ point$)$

Emma agrees to buy a truck and some equipment from Martha. They agree on a total

price of $$16,000$ for everything. Emma writes up the agreement to say she will

purchase "one pickup truck, $$15,000,$ one log splitter, $$500,$ one air compressor,

$$500,$ total $$17,000."$ After the agreement is signed, Martha demands payment of

$$17,000.$ Emma refuses. If the dispute should go to court, what would a court do

with this agreement?

The court should declare that Emma must pay $$17,000,$ because she wrote

the contract and should bear the risk of her own mistake.

The court should reform the agreement to reflect a price of $$16,000.$

The court should declare the contract void, due to an ambiguity.

The court should declare that Emma must pay $$17,000,$ because the parol

evidence rule does not allow evidence that contradicts the writing.