Question $12$

$0\mathrm{.}27$ pts

In Florida v$.$ Bostick, the court concluded that evidence seized during bus sweeps was admissible in court $q,.q,$

provided that probable cause was first established

because the passengers in a bus fall under the same expectations as those in any motor vehicle, as established in Maryland $v.$ Wilson

because a bus may be considered a public place where no expectations of privacy exist

provided that consent was given by the person whose belongings were searched

once the passengers had purchased their tickets